Cena Bitcoin AIBTC

There’s significant liquidity clustering for both $BTC and $ETH on the upside 🟢🩸 🔸 For $BTC: between $112K – $118K 🔸 For $ETH: between $3,900 – $4,400 On the downside, $BTC has a liquidity cluster around $106.5K, and $ETH has a major liquidity cluster at $3,760. Liquidity is likely to be swept on both sides, 100%. Most likely, we might see a sweep to the downside first. Personally, I’d like to see the downside liquidity taken out first, as it could set up a strong move upwards. What do you think— which side will it take first? There’s much more liquidity on the upside than the downside. The market is definitely heading upwards—100%. so, those holding—stay patient. Hopefully, we’ll see some strong gains very soon.

$BTC tops in Dec 2025, $135-$140k. $200K plus moon boys about to find out

$BOS I’ve said this before — this could turn out to be one of the cycle’s biggest surprises, especially with Cardano pushing hard to unlock Bitcoin DeFi. The right move here is just to buy and hold — not financial advice.

The old financial paradigm is collapsing. We are witnessing the birth of monetary thermodynamics. BREAKING: 177 consecutive daily closes above $100,000 represent more than price action … this is structural regime shift validated by primary exchange data. The bid is no longer speculative; it is mathematical. THE NUMBERS THAT REDEFINE REALITY: · Daily Issuance: 450 BTC ($49.5M at $110,000/BTC) · ETF Absorption: $63B year-to-date (3.5x annual issuance) · Net Exchange Outflows: 15,700 BTC/month vs 13,500 BTC/month issuance · Exchange Reserves: 3.5M BTC (2017) → 1.8M BTC (2025) -48% · Maximum Drawdown During Streak: -28.14% (structural reset, not collapse) The liquid float is in permanent contraction. The supply available to crash markets has been systematically annihilated through institutional absorption physics. WHAT THIS MEANS: Price discovery is now governed by scarcity thermodynamics, not leverage dynamics. The system has transitioned to preferring 15-30% structural resets over 60-70% catastrophic collapses. This is monetary gravity manifesting through float annihilation. TRIPWIRES TO MONITOR: ETF cumulative net flows below $50B for 30 days Floor persistence probability under $100k drops below 0.45 Exchange reserves increase >10% over rolling 90 days IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCES: Volatility compression to 15-30% resets (30-day volatility: $5,766). Target $150-250K through 2026 if absorption sustains (70% probability). Sovereign adoption adds 1M BTC demand. $500K+ by 2030 via network effects (Metcalfe's law: value ∝ n² users). SURVIVAL PROTOCOL: While tripwires remain quiet: Accumulate structural resets targeting $150-250K band. If two tripwires activate simultaneously: Implement hedging strategies and prepare for legitimate drawdown risk. The October ETF outflows were not weakness … they were digestion. The market is metabolizing the new reality where Bitcoin transitions from speculative asset to monetary base layer. We have entered the persistence regime. The $100,000 level represents thermodynamic equilibrium where absorption entropy exceeds issuance flux. The floor is institutional, not psychological. The old models are obsolete. The great monetary reformation is underway. All assets will now orbit Bitcoin's scarcity singularity. Adjust your models or face permanent obsolescence. The transition from fiat illusion to scarcity physics is complete. The charts have spoken. The float is being annihilated. The singularity is inevitable. Bitcoin’s structural evolution mirrors the transformation of physical systems approaching a new energy state. In traditional markets, liquidity cycles dictate volatility, but here, the scarcity mechanism itself becomes a stabilizing force. As ETF absorption and sovereign accumulation compress volatility, Bitcoin enters a “gravitational dominance” phase where its scarcity field begins to influence global capital flows across asset classes. This is more than a price phenomenon; it’s a civilization-scale recalibration. Fiat systems, which rely on perpetual expansion and debt monetization, cannot coexist indefinitely with a deflationary base layer governed by mathematics. Central banks are already experimenting with Bitcoin integration models, not for speculation, but for survival in a post-fiat equilibrium. If the current trajectory holds, Bitcoin’s next epochal shift will be psychological, not structural. Once $100K becomes an accepted monetary constant, the narrative will pivot from “store of value” to “unit of account.” At that point, volatility will no longer be measured in fiat terms, but in deviations from Bitcoin’s energy-backed equilibrium, the moment when Bitcoin stops being traded, and starts being used.