Mr Mintの‌価格MNT

🔊 *MNT SCALP TRADE:* Current price - $0.997 Entry price - $0.995 - $0.985 Type - LONG Target - $1.0,  $1.01 &  $1.02, $1.03+ Stop Loss (SL) - If 2H candle closes below $0.97 Disclaimer 👉 This is my personal analysis for educational purposes , Buy/Sell/Trade at your own risk. I am not a financial Advisor

MNT surged 38% with strong volume and bullish sentiment supporting continued momentum. IMX broke resistance near $0.70, NFT adoption drives 31% weekly price increase. XMR gained 15% despite network issues, privacy focus maintains strong investor confidence. Altseason can create significant opportunities for traders who know where to look. When the Altseason Index rises, certain altcoins tend to outperform due to strong fundamentals and growing market interest. Investors often seek tokens with active communities, clear use cases, and solid price momentum. Currently, Mantle, Immutable, and Monero show these qualities. Each has recorded notable gains in the past week, supported by rising trading volumes and positive community sentiment. Mantle (MNT) Source: Trading View Mantle has experienced a strong upward trend, reaching approximately US$1.69 in recent trading sessions. Over the past seven days, the token surged 38 percent, demonstrating growing confidence among investors. Since early September, MNT has steadily climbed from around US$1.30 to its current peak near US$1.70. Trading volume increased by more than 24 percent, showing that buying activity is supporting this trend. Community sentiment also remains positive, with roughly 74 percent of investors expressing bullish expectations. MNT has entered the so-called Greed Zone, which signals potential profit-taking for some traders. Immutable (IMX) Source: Trading View Immutable X has also demonstrated impressive performance, trading around US$0.72 after a 31 percent gain in the last seven days. The token successfully broke out of a consolidation range below US$0.60 and surpassed resistance near US$0.70. Trading volume increased by over 42 percent, confirming strong buying interest in the market. Community sentiment remains highly positive, with 85 percent of participants expecting further gains. The main driver behind IMX’s recent surge is its role in expanding NFT adoption. Investors believe the project can grow the NFT ecosystem, which adds real utility and long-term value. While technical indicators like the RSI suggest a potential short pause in momentum. Monero (XMR) Source: Trading View Monero has continued to climb despite technical issues, trading around US$313. Over the past week, the token increased more than 15 percent. The price has maintained an aggressive upward trend since early September, even after the network underwent reorganization by 18 blocks. Trading volume rose by 26 percent, indicating strong market interest and sustained investor confidence. Community sentiment remains solid at 74 percent, showing that investors remain optimistic about Monero’s fundamentals. The token focuses on transaction privacy, which continues to attract a dedicated user base. Even negative news has not significantly affected investor confidence, highlighting the resilience of XMR in the market. Mantle, Immutable, and Monero each show strong momentum and growing investor confidence. Rising trading volumes and positive community sentiment support continued bullish trends. Each token offers unique strengths, from multichain infrastructure to NFT adoption and privacy-focused solutions. Traders looking to capitalize on an active altseason may find these altcoins particularly promising. Tags: Altcoin Crypto market cryptocurrency Immutable (IMX) Mantle (MNT) Monero (XMR)

Crypto markets struggled throughout December, but a small group of institutional investors managed to close the year in the black. New on-chain data from analytics platform Nansen shows that while prices remained under pressure, several major crypto funds generated millions in realized gains, only to pivot toward aggressive selling as the month progressed. Elite Funds Secure Top Gains Amid Market Downturn According to Nansen, market maker Wintermute emerged as the most profitable fund in December, recording approximately $3.17 million in realized profit. Dragonfly Capital followed closely, with profits spread across multiple wallets totaling $1.9 million, $1.0 million, and $990,000. IOSG and Longling Capital also ranked among the top performers. Together, these trends suggest that profits were concentrated among a repeat group of highly active institutional traders rather than isolated, one-off wallets. Profits are concentrated among a small group of repeat funds, not one-off wallets, Nansen noted, highlighting how consistent execution and active trade management separated institutional winners from the broader market downturn. Arrington, Pantera, and Polychain also featured in Nansens 30-day dataset from five blockchain networks, each with varied profitability. December 2025 profit rankings show Wintermute leading with $3.17M, followed by multiple Dragonfly Capital wallets. Nansen December proved challenging for most crypto participants as volatility increased and sentiment weakened into year-end. Despite this backdrop, Wintermute and Dragonfly Capital capitalized on short-term dislocations and liquidity-driven opportunities. Their performance highlights the advantage of scale, sophisticated trading infrastructure, and multi-chain monitoring during periods of market stress. Dragonflys strategy stood out for its diversification across wallets, allowing the fund to spread risk while capturing upside across different positions. Meanwhile, Wintermutes dominance reflected its role as a leading liquidity provider capable of profiting from volatility rather than being harmed by it. IOSG and Longling Capital also posted notable gains, placing them among the months most profitable funds. Together, the data paints a picture of institutional resilience at a time when retail traders largely struggled to stay afloat. Active Profit-Taking Shapes On-Chain Behavior However, Nansens on-chain tracking shows that these same profitable funds are now leaning toward selling rather than accumulation. On December 26, QCP Capital deposited 199.99 ETH, worth roughly $595,929, into the Binance exchange, a move typically associated with preparing assets for sale. QCP Capital transferred 199.99 ETH worth $595,929 to Binance on December 26, 2025. Nansen Wintermute has also been active on the sell side. While social media commentary has accused the firm of aggressively dumping Bitcoin and Ethereum during December volatility, on-chain data confirms that Wintermute reduced exposure after building positions earlier in the month. 🚨 BREAKING:WINTERMUTE ACCUMULATED MILLIONS WORTH OF $BTC AND $ETH RIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS DUMPTHEY DUMPED $125M+ OF $BTC IN A MINUTE, DROPPING IT TO $24KTHIS IS PURE CHRISTMAS MANIPULATION!! https://t.co/hSbWI1Bl2R pic.twitter.com/MmQv1nBZql ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ (@DeFiTracer) December 25, 2025 The activity aligns with profit-taking and risk management rather than passive holding. Dragonfly Capital similarly reduced its positions in Mantle (MNT). Over seven days in December, the fund deposited 6 million MNT tokens, worth approximately $6.95 million, to Bybit. .@dragonfly_xyz (Dragonfly Capital) continues depositing $MNT to @Bybit_Official.Over the past 7 days, they've already sent 6,000,000 $MNT (~$6.95M USD)They still hold 9.15M tokens across multiple wallets, worth around $10.76M. pic.twitter.com/3M2s5se9l6 Nansen 🧭 (@nansen_ai) December 21, 2025 Despite these sales, Dragonfly still holds 9.15 million MNT tokens, valued at around $10.76 million, suggesting a partial rather than complete exit. The contrast between strong December profits and rising sell pressure illustrates a dual institutional strategy: Exploit volatility when opportunities arise, De-risk quickly as conditions shift. For professional funds, year-end selling may also reflect portfolio rebalancing, capital preservation, or preparation for new allocations in the early part of 2026. While continued selling from top-performing funds could weigh on short-term prices, it may also signal discipline rather than bearish conviction. Read the article at BeInCrypto

Layer 1 and Layer 2 tokens sank in 2025 as users and capital rotated to Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain and revenue-generating protocols despite strong developer activity. Summary Layer1 tokens saw steep price and user losses in 2025, while Bitcoin held relative strength and BNB Chain nearly tripled users as others bled activity.​ Overleveraged tokenomics, weak value capture, and institutional preference for BTC and ETH drove sustained sell pressure on alternative L1 and L2 tokens.​ Stablecoin issuers and derivatives platforms dominated revenue, while generic infrastructure tokens faced consolidation risk and a trend toward irrelevance.​ Layer 1 blockchain tokens experienced significant depreciation in 2025, with major assets losing substantial value despite sustained developer activity, according to an end-of-year report from OAK Research released this week. Altcoins head into new year with hope While Bitcoin maintained relative strength throughout the year, alternative Layer 1 tokens experienced sell-offs that exposed structural weaknesses in tokenomics and market positioning, the report stated. The findings reveal a shift from speculation to fundamental value creation, with the market responding negatively to protocols unable to demonstrate economic activity. Total Monthly Active Users declined 25.15% across major chains, according to the report’s blockchain metrics analysis. Solana recorded the steepest decline, losing nearly 94 million users, representing a drop of more than 60%, while BNB Chain nearly tripled its user base by capturing participants from other platforms. Layer 2 networks experienced similar divergence. Base demonstrated the strongest growth in Total Value Locked (TVL), solidifying its position through Coinbase’s distribution advantage, according to the report. Optimism saw TVL contract significantly as capital rotated toward competitors. The majority of major Layer 1 tokens finished the year with losses, while some newer entrants saw extreme declines, the report stated. Layer 2 tokens experienced similar performance despite technical progress. Optimism and zkSync Era posted severe declines, while Polygon and Arbitrum also fell substantially. Only Mantle (MNT) managed a modest gain, attributed to concentrated supply control rather than fundamental strength, according to the analysis. The report identified three primary forces behind the decline: overleveraged tokenomics with continuous unlock schedules; lack of credible value-capture mechanisms linking network usage to token demand; and institutional preference for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum over smaller-cap alternatives. Despite price declines, developer activity remained robust across select ecosystems, according to data from Electric Capital cited in the report. The EVM stack maintained the largest developer base, with thousands of contributors including many full-time developers. Bitcoin posted the strongest two-year growth in full-time developers among major ecosystems. Solana and the broader SVM stack also grew substantially over two years, demonstrating sustained technical development despite token performance. The disconnect between developer activity and token prices revealed market maturation, the report stated. Teams continued building through down cycles, but speculative capital no longer rewarded infrastructure without clear paths to revenue generation. Stablecoin issuers dominated revenue generation, accounting for the vast majority of income among top protocols, according to the report. Tether and Circle combined generated significant annual revenue, while derivatives platforms added meaningful fee-based income through sustainable models. Generic Layer 1s and Layer 2s lacking differentiation could not compete, the report stated, noting that networks required improvements in speed, cost, or security to justify independent existence. Infrastructure tokens face continued headwinds despite regulatory clarity in key markets, according to the report’s outlook for 2026. The combination of high inflation schedules, insufficient demand for governance rights, and concentration of value capture in base layers suggests further consolidation ahead. Protocols that generate meaningful revenue may stabilize, but remain subject to broader market volatility and persistent unlock pressure from early investors, the report concluded. The analysis stated that survival for existing Layer 1 tokens depends on leadership from major platforms and renewed institutional adoption, warning that generic infrastructure tokens will continue to trend toward irrelevance as capital concentrates in protocols demonstrating economic value rather than technological novelty alone.