Jupiter priceJUP

entry long JupUsdt, and target 0.66 usdt

Solana ETFs face SEC deadlines Oct 10–16, with major issuers (VanEck, Fidelity, Grayscale, Bitwise and more) updating filings last week. On-chain shows ~3M $SOL withdrawn from exchanges in 6 days, spot traders are accumulating, but options skew signals mid-term caution. $JUP $PEPE

Upcoming unlock schedule for 50 tokens; I personally only look to trade Futures when it’s a Cliff Unlock and the unlocked amount is greater than 25% of daily trading volume. If you’re focused on long-term investing, pay attention so you can optimize entries after each unlock. Currently, there are 11 unlock events worth watching where the unlocked amount versus daily trading volume is high: $JUP - 44,69% $BIGTIME - 128,31% $PRIME - 52,14% $REZ - 41,02% $KMNO - 79,84% $SUI - 12878,18% $ZETA - 66,52% $GPS - 37,39% $EIGEN - 39,60% $IMX - 26,26% $SPEC - 114,55% #TokenUnlocks #CryptoInsights

Distribution is the silent catalyst in crypto. A token lives in obscurity until it finds its stage. Case in point: ➢ $PENDLE: volumes and price re-rated sharply after Upbit access. ➢ $ASTR, $JUP: both saw narrative expansion post-listing. The common factor? @Official_Upbit. The same setup is now in play for @Infinit_Labs' $IN. Key context: 75% of supply is still locked, meaning float is thin. In such cases, new demand creates reflexivity: price moves drive attention → more liquidity → stronger flows → further price moves. ● The Reflexivity Loop Explained Thin float tokens respond disproportionately to distribution shocks. - Circulating supply: 230M $IN (out of 1B max). - Float %: 23%. Effect = higher marginal impact per dollar traded. Reflexivity loop: - Price up = attracts social/CT attention - Volume up = more traders onboard - Liquidity up = allocators engage - Narrative consolidates = reinforces demand This loop is already visible in $IN’s early Upbit trading data. ● Fundamentals vs. Distribution Listings alone don’t create sustainable value. They only accelerate existing fundamentals. $IN has fundamentals to back it: ➢ Infinit V2: one-click DeFi strategy execution. ➢ AI agent swarm: specialized bots for discovery, execution, risk. ➢ Non-custodial design: assets remain in user wallets. Distribution (Upbit) + Infrastructure (V2) = a stronger feedback system. ● My $IN Price Prediction If @Infinit_Labs scales as the “agentic execution layer” for DeFi, token value should track platform volumes. Assumptions: - TAM (2026): $50B DeFi automation notional (restaking, intent markets, structured yield). - Market share: 3% = $1.5B annualized volume. - Take rate: 20 bps = $3M fees. - Multiple: 15x (Pendle benchmark). → $45M value accrual. At 230M circulating tokens → $0.20 fair value (3x vs current). Upside case (10% share by 2027): - $5B volume → $10M fees → $200M value capture. - $0.85/token (10–12x). ● Conclusion Thin float + new demand creates reflexivity. But reflexivity without fundamentals burns out. $IN’s edge is that Infinit V2 and the agent swarm give the loop something to anchor to.