Reevaluating MMT After Quantitative Easing: Insights from the Latest Rise in MMT Price Forecasts and Their Implications for Market Outlook

The era following quantitative easing (QE) has brought about a significant shift in global financial markets, with Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) gaining traction as both a conceptual framework and a real-world driver of investor decisions. As central banks move away from highly accommodative stances, the interaction between MMT’s fiscal ideas and changing market conditions has become a central topic for both analysts and investors. The recent spike in price forecasts tied to MMT—especially for assets like the Momentum (MMT) token—illustrates a complex story involving risk tolerance, macroeconomic outlooks, and the evolving influence of monetary policy on asset prices.

MMT’s Shifting Impact on Fiscal Policy and Digital Assets

The fundamental beliefs of MMT—particularly the view that governments with control over their own currency can run deficits without facing default—have sparked debate in both academic and policy arenas for years. Yet, its real-world impact has grown notably in 2025, especially within the digital asset sector.

, that MMT’s focus on fiscal flexibility has increased demand for assets that protect against inflation, such as cryptocurrencies, during times of aggressive government spending and low interest rates. This trend has been further strengthened by the emergence of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), which reflect MMT’s approach to government-backed monetary adaptability while providing regulatory oversight that decentralized cryptocurrencies often lack .

However, the dominance of MMT appears to be fading as more traditional economic models regain prominence. In the second quarter of 2025, the fixed-income sector

, with investors seeking greater returns for holding long-term bonds—a sign that the era of ultra-low rates is ending. This adjustment points to a renewed focus on classic risk and return measures over MMT-driven narratives, even as MMT continues to influence broader economic expectations.

Investor Strategies in the Wake of QE

The third quarter of 2025 provides insight into how investors have adjusted to the post-QE landscape. After the Federal Reserve reduced rates by 25 basis points in September and hinted at two more cuts before year-end, market participants have revised their approaches to reflect a weakening job market and ongoing inflation

. Additional government spending, including the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, has fueled further optimism, with analysts expecting GDP growth to accelerate due to tax reductions and targeted incentives .

Stock markets have experienced a significant shift, with leadership moving from large-cap growth companies to small-cap and value stocks, reflecting a broader hunt for undervalued assets amid increased fiscal stimulus

. At the same time, investments driven by artificial intelligence remain a major theme, as companies allocate more capital toward AI infrastructure and implementation . Nevertheless, high valuations and sector-specific risks have made it clear that fundamental analysis and portfolio diversification are still crucial, even as AI continues to transform corporate earnings .

The

MMT

Token Rally: Hype or Fundamentals?

The Momentum (MMT) token’s dramatic 1,300% increase in 2025 has captured widespread interest, but its price movement seems to be driven more by external factors than by MMT’s theoretical foundation. Bitget’s analysis attributes the surge to Binance airdrops, institutional investments, and broader trends in crypto speculation—demonstrating the speculative tendencies of digital assets in the post-QE era

. While fiscal policies inspired by MMT may have created a supportive macroeconomic environment, the token’s performance highlights the shortcomings of relying solely on MMT for valuing specific assets .

This gap between theory and real-world outcomes prompts important questions for investors. Can MMT’s concepts serve as a reliable guide for asset allocation in markets increasingly shaped by algorithms, regulatory changes, and economic uncertainty? As of 2025, the answer appears to be mixed: MMT remains a valuable lens for understanding government fiscal policy, but it offers limited accuracy when forecasting the movements of individual tokens or stocks.

Conclusion: Integrating MMT with Traditional Investment Approaches

The post-QE period calls for a well-rounded investment approach—one that recognizes MMT’s impact on economic policy but bases portfolio decisions on established risk management practices. For investors, this means managing the volatility of speculative assets like the MMT token while capitalizing on fiscal momentum in areas such as AI infrastructure and small-cap stocks. For policymakers, it highlights the importance of aligning MMT-inspired fiscal actions with long-term growth goals, ensuring that expansive measures do not unintentionally create asset bubbles or drive up inflation.

As financial markets continue to change, the relationship between MMT and investor behavior will remain a critical topic. The latest surge in MMT price forecasts is not just a sign of theoretical enthusiasm, but also an indicator of how investors are navigating the complexities of the post-QE environment.