Dash Falls 17.83% Within a Day as Analysts Lower Targets and Major 2026 Expenditure Announced
- DoorDash (DASH) fell 17.83% in 24 hours amid analyst target cuts and 2026 spending plans. - Goldman Sachs and others reduced price targets, averaging $286.55 (41.83% upside). - Q3 revenue rose 27% to $3.4B, but near-term profits lagged due to costs; CEO Tony Xu plans AI/robot investments. - 2026 spending will increase by hundreds of millions to integrate Deliveroo into a global tech stack.
On November 8, 2025,
Goldman Sachs has revised its price target for
DASH’s technical outlook has been mixed. The company posted a 27% year-over-year revenue increase in the third quarter, reaching $3.4 billion, fueled by higher order volumes and gross order value. However, short-term profits missed forecasts due to increased operating expenses. CEO Tony Xu outlined plans to invest in next-generation delivery technology, such as autonomous robots and AI-powered systems, though these efforts will require substantial capital. Despite a 19% gain since the start of the year, the stock has fallen 22% this quarter.
DASH is planning to ramp up spending by several hundred million dollars in 2026, focusing on merging newly acquired companies like Deliveroo into a single global technology platform. These ambitious investments have overshadowed the company’s robust revenue growth and strong EBITDA results in the third quarter.
Backtest Hypothesis
Given the recent steep 17.83% decline and the ongoing trend of analyst downgrades and increased capital spending, a backtest can help evaluate how a stock typically performs after a daily drop of 10% or more. Using DASH as a case study, the backtest will review historical recoveries following such significant declines. By pinpointing all instances where DASH fell by at least 10% in a day and tracking its performance over the subsequent 30 days, investors can gauge whether these sharp drops are usually temporary or signal deeper issues.
The backtest will utilize daily return data from January 1, 2022, onward, covering both rising and falling markets. This analysis seeks to determine if DASH has historically bounced back after intraday losses of 10% or more, and under what circumstances such rebounds are most likely. The findings may help clarify whether the recent drop on November 6–7 is an overreaction or a sign of changing investor attitudes.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Internet Computer's Latest Rally: Genuine Breakthrough or Temporary Hype?
- Internet Computer (ICP) surged 45% to $5.20 in Q3 2025, driven by institutional interest in AI-tokenized infrastructure and blockchain innovations. - Infrastructure advances like canister smart contracts and 21.4 GB on-chain storage contrast with a 22.4% decline in DApp engagement, highlighting adoption challenges. - Institutional TVL growth ($237B) and partnerships boost ICP's profile, but speculative trading (261% volume spike) overshadows organic DApp usage. - Analysts warn of a potential bubble witho

ICP Price Jumps 30%: Is This the Dawn of a New Chapter for the Internet Computer Ecosystem?
- ICP surged 30% in Q3 2025 driven by protocol upgrades, institutional adoption, and speculative momentum. - Technical indicators show strong momentum but DApp engagement fell 22.4%, highlighting adoption gaps. - Institutional interest grew through IoT solutions and DeFi integration, though ecosystem fragmentation persists. - Market forecasts suggest volatile range-bound trading ahead, with sustainability dependent on bridging innovation and user growth.

It’s not a bubble, because AI is already running the markets

The November 2025 Bitcoin Leverage Liquidation Event: Exposing Systemic Vulnerabilities in DeFi Lending and Margin Trading
- The 2025 Bitcoin leverage liquidation crisis exposed critical DeFi vulnerabilities, triggering $1.3B in liquidations and destabilizing protocols like Balancer and Stream Finance. - Exploits in stable pools and opaque Curator models caused $160M in frozen funds, with Euler facing $137M in bad debt after Stream Finance's xUSD collapse. - Experts warn of systemic risks as DeFi's interconnectedness amplifies failures, while solutions like RedStone's Credora aim to address real-time credit monitoring gaps. -
