Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
The end game for stablecoins: Brand-name stables and fintech L1s

The end game for stablecoins: Brand-name stables and fintech L1s

CryptoSlateCryptoSlate2025/09/29 21:00
By:John deVadoss

The following is a guest post and opinion from John deVadoss, Co-Founder of the InterWork Alliancez.

The stablecoin market is converging on two power centers: brand-name stables issued by firms consumers already trust, and “fintech L1s” — base layers purpose‑built or tightly controlled by regulated fintechs. Everything else will orbit these because they maximize profits, defensibility, and distribution while fitting comfortably inside the policy perimeter.

Brand stables win first on distribution. Payments is a scale game. If a dollar token can be dropped into an existing wallet with millions of KYC’d users, plugged into merchant networks, and supported by compliance teams, it acquires liquidity faster than any crypto‑native alternative. The cost of acquiring a new transacting user approaches zero when the stable is just another balance type in an app people already open daily.

Second, brand stables monetize at scale. They sit on large, low‑cost, sticky balances and invest reserves in high‑quality short‑term assets. That float is a durable revenue stream, more dependable than volatile trading fees. On top, issuers can layer payment revenues: cross‑border FX spread, merchant acceptance fees, treasury services for platforms, and white‑label programs for partners. The combination of float income and payments economics makes brand stables a self‑financing growth engine.

Third, the moat is regulatory. Household‑name issuers already maintain licenses, bank relationships, audits, and sanctions controls. They know how to answer supervisory exams and file suspicious activity reports. That turns policy risk into a competitive advantage. As stablecoin statutes and rules mature — from reserve composition to redemption rights — compliance becomes more of a wall that keeps poorly capitalized entrants out.

Policy is shaping product design. Expect brand stables to likely be multi‑chain but centrally controlled, with blacklist and freeze functions, transparent attestations, bankruptcy‑remote reserve structures, and explicit redemption windows. Messaging standards that carry Travel‑Rule data and screening hooks will be standard. These are not nice‑to‑haves; they will be table stakes for regulators, and the winners will ride this trend.

If brand stables are the money, fintech L1s are the rails. Fintechs learned that renting blockspace from general‑purpose chains exposes them to fee volatility, MEV extraction, governance whiplash, and uneven compliance. Owning the base layer lets them bake policy into the protocol: whitelisted validators, embedded identity, enforceable Travel‑Rule messaging, and deterministic compliance actions. It also delivers predictable fees, fast finality, and upgrade paths aligned with regulated use cases.

Control of the base layer re‑bundles the economics. Fintech L1s capture transaction fees, shape or internalize MEV, and direct sequencer revenue. Those revenues can subsidize near‑zero fees while still rewarding validators and partners. Incentives align: builders and regulated nodes are paid to add throughput, not extract rent. Distribution will take care of the rest: fintechs that touch payroll, remittances, acquiring, or wallets can make their chain the default — no new wallets, instant on/off‑ramps — with the native stable as the unit of account.

What doesn’t win? Algorithmic or undercollateralized stables — misaligned with policy and fragile in stress. Crypto‑collateralized stables will likely persist, but capital intensity limits mainstream use. Generic public L1s are still relevant for open finance, but without embedded compliance and owned distribution, their payment share caps out. CBDCs will move slowly; privacy and design trade-offs loom; expect them to coexist as wholesale settlement infrastructure and public money, not retail rails (ironically, stablecoins that are blessed by policymakers will likely become the de facto ‘retail CBDC’ in those jurisdictions).

Compete on UX, credit, and vertical software — new entrants cannot fight distribution and cannot take on compliance head‑on. If you can’t be a brand stable or a fintech L1, integrate with them. Offer programmable escrow, working‑capital credit, payroll, and cross‑border apps that exploit instant settlement. For regulators, harmonize reserve, disclosure, and redemption standards, push for interoperability at the messaging layer, and support market experimentation with public‑permissioned models and accountable node sets.

Incumbent banks across the globe face a choice: become essential service providers — custodians, reserve managers, issuers of tokenized deposits, validator nodes — or watch deposits migrate to fintech‑native monetization models. The prize is recurring float income plus control of modernized payment rails.

The through‑line is simple: profits fund resilience, compliance builds moats, and distribution decides the winners.

The end game is an assemblage of brand‑name monies riding on fintech‑owned base layers.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

SEC Investigates Crypto Company Connected to Trump for Delayed Disclosures and Management Issues

- SEC investigates Alt5 Sigma over delayed CEO suspension disclosure and $1.5B token swap linked to Trump-backed World Liberty Financial. - Discrepancies in reporting a six-week delay in publicizing Peter Tessopoulos' suspension raise compliance concerns and triggered an 83% stock plunge. - Firm's ties to Eric Trump and $500M transfers to Trump-linked entities amplify scrutiny amid allegations of money laundering facilitation. - Executive dismissals without misconduct claims and governance turmoil highligh

Bitget-RWA2025/11/29 00:26
SEC Investigates Crypto Company Connected to Trump for Delayed Disclosures and Management Issues

Dogecoin News Today: Dogecoin ETFs Struggle to Boost Prices, Underscoring Difficulties in the Altcoin Market

- Dogecoin ETFs (BWOW, GDOG) failed to trigger price recovery, with GDOG's $1.4M day-one volume far below $12M forecasts. - Despite institutional interest in DOGE (7th-largest crypto at $22B), indirect exposure structures lack regulatory protections and face volatility risks. - Technical analysis shows DOGE forming bullish patterns near $0.15, but ETF-driven inflows remain insufficient to break $0.155 resistance. - Altcoin ETFs face uneven reception: Solana/XRP products outperformed DOGE, highlighting chal

Bitget-RWA2025/11/29 00:26
Dogecoin News Today: Dogecoin ETFs Struggle to Boost Prices, Underscoring Difficulties in the Altcoin Market

Uruguay’s Energy Challenges Disrupt Tether’s $500 Million Cryptocurrency Investment

- Tether abruptly ended its $500M Uruguay Bitcoin mining project due to unsustainable energy costs and uncompetitive tariffs. - The project, initially promoted as eco-friendly, faced $4.8M in unpaid bills and regulatory challenges. - The exit highlights risks for crypto miners in regions with volatile energy markets and uncertain policies. - Tether remains interested in Latin American green energy projects despite the Uruguay setback.

Bitget-RWA2025/11/29 00:08
Uruguay’s Energy Challenges Disrupt Tether’s $500 Million Cryptocurrency Investment

Solana News Update: Solana Experiences Sharp Price Drop, Yet Institutional Investments Reflect Confidence in Its Future

- A $239M whale transfer on Solana by Forward Industries to Fireblocks Custody highlights institutional confidence amid SOL's 53% price drop since January 2025. - Upexi's $23M private placement and 40% stock decline underscore crypto exposure risks as institutional Solana ETF inflows hit $420M in November. - CME's Dec 15 SOL/XRP futures launch and Fidelity's staking ETFs signal growing institutional adoption despite Solana's $77.4B market cap decline. - Whale activity and ETF trends suggest strategic long-

Bitget-RWA2025/11/29 00:08
Solana News Update: Solana Experiences Sharp Price Drop, Yet Institutional Investments Reflect Confidence in Its Future