Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Bitcoin’s Fundamental Dilemma: Balancing Spam Prevention and the Threat of Censorship

Bitcoin’s Fundamental Dilemma: Balancing Spam Prevention and the Threat of Censorship

Bitget-RWA2025/09/27 17:10
By:Coin World

- Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr denies proposing a hard fork to create a multisig committee for retroactively altering blockchain data, including removing illicit content like CSAM via ZKPs. - The controversy highlights a divide between Bitcoin Knots (strict spam filters) and Core (permissive approach), with critics warning of censorship risks and regulatory capture. - Market volatility followed, as Bitcoin’s price dropped 2.2% post-leak, though no direct causal link was confirmed, reflecting fears of comp

Bitcoin’s Fundamental Dilemma: Balancing Spam Prevention and the Threat of Censorship image 0

Bitcoin Developer Faces Backlash Over Alleged Hard Fork Suggestion

Luke Dashjr, who maintains the

Knots project, has refuted accusations that he advocated for a hard fork to introduce a trusted multisignature committee with the power to retroactively change the blockchain. The allegations, initially reported by The Rage on September 25, 2025, referenced supposed leaked messages implying Dashjr supported a system to remove illegal material, such as child sexual abuse content (CSAM), through zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) and a multisig committee [ 1 ]. Dashjr firmly denied these claims, saying, “The reality is I have not suggested a hard fork or anything similar,” and accused his critics of “grasping at straws to smear me and sabotage my attempts to protect Bitcoin once again” [ 1 ].

This dispute has reignited the ongoing rift between the Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Core communities. Knots enforces more rigorous rules to block non-financial data like Ordinals and Runes tokens, whereas Core developers generally allow such data [ 1 ]. The rumored hard fork, if realized, would create a unique process to remove data after confirmation, diverging from Bitcoin’s consensus mechanism, where reorganizations are rare and economically discouraged. Opponents warn that such a change could open the door to forced removals, politically motivated censorship, or regulatory overreach [ 2 ].

Industry responses have been sharply divided. Udi Wertheimer, co-founder of Taproot Wizards and the Ordinals project, dismissed the article as a “hit piece,” stressing that the leaked chats only explored theoretical ideas like ZKPs for filtering spam without splitting the network [ 1 ]. Blockstream CEO Adam Back cautioned that the proposal “bypassed slippery slope concerns” and “went straight to implementing censorship technology” previously criticized as a threat to Bitcoin’s unchangeable nature [ 2 ]. Abra’s founder Bill Barhydt compared the situation to a “second Bitcoin war,” warning that rumors of a hard fork could be used as a “bait-and-switch” by a minority group [ 2 ].

The controversy has also led to market turbulence. Bitcoin’s value dropped 2.2% to $109,000 within a day of the leak, and was down 5.5% over the previous week [ 1 ]. Although no direct cause has been confirmed, the price decline coincided with growing uncertainty. The leaked messages, which mentioned a “buried-state modification” to flag questionable transactions, heightened concerns that Bitcoin’s resistance to censorship—a fundamental aspect of its design—might be at risk [ 2 ].

Dashjr has not released any technical documentation or rollout plan for the supposed mechanism, leaving the discussion based on speculation. The lack of an official proposal has led some to doubt the authenticity of the leak, with The Rage’s reporter L0la L33tz noting the dangers of “destroying Bitcoin over JPEGs” [ 2 ]. Meanwhile, some developers are urging restraint, suggesting that protocol changes should be considered over centuries to prevent destabilizing the network [ 2 ].

This episode highlights the deep philosophical divide over Bitcoin’s governance: should the protocol remain a neutral platform for settlement, or should developers actively block non-monetary uses? Supporters of Dashjr argue that tighter spam controls preserve Bitcoin’s financial purity, while critics see any centralized oversight as fundamentally opposed to its decentralized nature [ 1 ]. As the debate continues, the community is split on whether the proposed hard fork is a necessary step forward or a fundamental threat to Bitcoin’s foundational values.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

LUNA - Decreased by 0.14% Over the Past 24 Hours Amid Ongoing Market Fluctuations

- LUNA fell 0.14% in 24 hours to $0.074, showing 20.88% monthly and 82.18% annual declines amid persistent volatility. - Spirit Blockchain Capital filed Q3 2025 financials, appointed interim CFO, and focuses on European blockchain infrastructure development. - Bitcoin Munari (BTCM) launched a 21M fixed supply model with Solana-based infrastructure, targeting stable digital asset adoption by 2027. - Airbus software disruptions highlighted systemic risks in complex digital ecosystems, reinforcing blockchain

Bitget-RWA2025/11/29 07:04
LUNA - Decreased by 0.14% Over the Past 24 Hours Amid Ongoing Market Fluctuations

Turkmenistan’s Digital Currency Bet: Navigating Government Oversight and Technological Progress

- Turkmenistan legalizes crypto trading/mining by 2026 under strict state-controlled regulations, marking a historic shift for its closed economy. - The law mandates licensing, AML protocols, and cold storage for exchanges while prohibiting banks from crypto services and reserving state authority over token validation. - Global crypto regulation trends align with Turkmenistan's move, as nations like the UK, EU, and Central Asian neighbors advance digital asset frameworks. - Despite potential for energy-dri

Bitget-RWA2025/11/29 06:52
Turkmenistan’s Digital Currency Bet: Navigating Government Oversight and Technological Progress

Ethereum Update: Major Institutions and ETF Investments Drive Ethereum Past $3,000 as Fed Eases QT

- Ethereum's price surged above $3,030 amid rising institutional demand, ETF inflows, and whale accumulation, driven by Fed policy shifts and technical optimism. - BlackRock's IBIT saw $130M inflows while a whale added 6,000 ETH ($17M), signaling confidence as Fed quantitative tightening nears its December end. - Technical indicators show oversold RSI and record Apparent Demand (90,995 ETH), mirroring a 2023 pattern that preceded a 165% rally to $4,100. - Despite $230M ETF inflows, Ethereum remains volatil

Bitget-RWA2025/11/29 06:52
Ethereum Update: Major Institutions and ETF Investments Drive Ethereum Past $3,000 as Fed Eases QT

Energy expenses and outstanding debts compel Tether to withdraw from its $500 million mining project in Uruguay

- Tether halted Uruguay Bitcoin mining due to rising energy costs and $4.8M debt with UTE. - The $500M project ended with 30 layoffs after $150M spent on mining/infrastructure. - Uncompetitive energy tariffs and lack of long-term contracts caused the venture's collapse. - The exit highlights crypto mining's vulnerability to volatile energy markets and regulatory gaps. - Tether remains focused on Latin American renewables but no Uruguay restart timeline exists.

Bitget-RWA2025/11/29 06:52
Energy expenses and outstanding debts compel Tether to withdraw from its $500 million mining project in Uruguay