Virtuals Protocol Shifts Away from Speculative Token Launches to Emphasize Contributor-Centric Approach
- Virtuals Protocol terminates Genesis project, a speculative AI agent token launch model, to adopt a contributor-focused framework. - Genesis aimed to combat market manipulation by allocating tokens based on ecosystem contributions like staking and agent investments. - The system featured dynamic point allocation, 30-day validity periods, and caps to prevent concentration, with 50% tokens reserved for developers. - Analysts highlight Genesis' success in equitable distribution, outperforming traditional mo

Virtuals Protocol has revealed it will discontinue its Genesis project, which served as a token distribution system for AI agents, and will soon introduce a new launch approach. Since April 17, the Genesis Launch operated on Base, aiming to tackle persistent problems in on-chain token allocation such as manipulation and inequitable distribution. According to the protocol’s whitepaper, the goal was to move away from secretive and speculative methods, instead establishing a transparent, contribution-driven process that aligns the interests of both ecosystem members and project creators. This change demonstrates the protocol’s dedication to promoting fairness and sustainability in the launch of AI agent tokens Genesis Launch | Virtuals Protocol Whitepaper [ 1 ].
The Genesis Launch system was intended to shift influence from speculators to those actively contributing within the Virtuals ecosystem. Participants, known as “Virgens,” could accumulate points by staking
Genesis featured an automatic refund process for launches that failed to raise at least 42,425 VIRTUAL tokens. If a launch was successful, participants received tokens based on their points and subscriptions, with a maximum of 0.5% of the total supply per wallet to avoid excessive concentration. Developers kept 50% of tokens for development, treasury, and marketing, while 37.5% were allocated to public sales and 12.5% to liquidity pools. This standardized model was designed to limit the dominance of large holders and promote fairer token distribution Ending On-Chain Snipers and Manipulation? Quick … [ 2 ].
According to Decripto, all tokens distributed through Genesis Launches have performed well, highlighting the mechanism’s effectiveness. By prioritizing measurable contributions and transparent allocation, Genesis reportedly surpassed traditional speculative approaches that often favored insiders. Experts observed that this fair and systematic method increased early exposure for AI agent projects, helping to align the interests of developers and early supporters Genesis Launch, how Virtuals Protocol works and how it is … [ 3 ].
Virtuals Protocol’s move to a new launch system reflects a wider industry shift toward rebuilding equitable distribution models as enthusiasm for AI agents declines. The forthcoming model is expected to expand on Genesis’s foundation while tackling issues like scalability and long-term incentives for participants. By emphasizing contribution-based entry and adaptive allocation, the protocol has already set an example for reducing manipulation in tokenized ecosystems, potentially influencing similar projects Ending On-Chain Snipers and Manipulation? Quick … [ 2 ].
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Hyperdrive’s thBILL: A Reliable Haven Amid DeFi’s Turbulent Seas
- Hyperdrive confirms thBILL asset's security after investigation, despite $773K drained from two treasury wallets via an attack. - Market stability persists with no regulatory action, as DeFi protocols like Hyperdrive pause markets and inject liquidity to mitigate risks. - DeFi sector faces heightened security concerns after Hyperdrive's breach and HyperVault's $3.6M exit scam, testing ecosystem resilience. - Proactive measures and six audits have prevented systemic flaws, but rapid incidents shifted inve

HOLO has dropped by 4436.56% over the past year as a result of network enhancements and changes in governance.
- HOLO's price fell 4436.56% in 1 year amid network upgrades and governance restructures. - Decentralized governance transition and node instability worsened prolonged bearish pressure. - Technical indicators show deepening bearish sentiment with RSI in oversold territory for weeks. - Low on-chain activity suggests retail selling drives the decline, not large holder exits. - A backtesting strategy using MA crossovers and RSI thresholds aims to evaluate trend-following viability.

SOMI - 411.13% Plunge in 24 Hours as Market Swings Wildly
- SOMI dropped 411.13% in 24 hours, following a 1889.9% 7-day decline and 5703.82% monthly/annual gains. - Technical analysts highlight eroding support levels and heightened volatility amid broad market shifts. - The drop reflects speculative trading patterns and risks, with institutional investors reassessing portfolios. - A backtesting strategy using RSI and moving averages aims to manage volatility through mean-reversion trades.

BARD -190.99% 24H Decline as Significant Devaluation Pressure Mounts
- BARD plunged 190.99% in 24 hours, 3077.94% in 7 days, and 153.93% over 1 month/year amid severe devaluation pressure. - Market scrutiny intensified after tokenomics revisions revealed reduced staking incentives and emission rates, signaling structural adjustments. - Technical indicators show RSI at 10 (oversold), bearish MA crossover, and failed support levels, deepening liquidity concerns. - A backtesting strategy combines RSI thresholds and MA crossovers to identify high-probability trades amid extreme

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








