Fragmented regulations across the EU allow 100 individuals to lose €100M to a crypto scam
- European police dismantled a €100M crypto fraud network affecting 100+ victims across 23 countries via fake investment platforms. - Scammers used Lithuanian bank accounts to launder funds, exploiting jurisdictional gaps in fragmented EU crypto regulations. - The six-year scheme exposed systemic weaknesses in investor protections and cross-border financial oversight. - International collaboration between Eurojust, Europol, and six nations led to arrests and asset freezes, highlighting ongoing crypto crime

A joint effort by European law enforcement agencies has broken up a cryptocurrency investment scam that targeted over 100 individuals in 23 different countries, resulting in losses of at least €100 million. The investigation, which began in 2018, was coordinated by Eurojust and received support from Europol. Authorities in Spain, Portugal, Italy, Romania, Bulgaria, and Lithuania carried out simultaneous arrests and asset seizures. Five people were taken into custody, and several bank accounts were frozen during the operation.
The criminals behind the scheme set up convincing fake crypto investment websites, luring victims with promises of substantial profits. When investors tried to retrieve their money, they were hit with extra charges, only for the platforms to vanish soon after. The stolen money was funneled through Lithuanian banks, taking advantage of regulatory loopholes and the international nature of Europe’s financial system. The scam’s persistence for more than six years exposed weaknesses in regulatory consistency and highlighted the lack of strong protections for crypto investors.
This crackdown required extensive international cooperation. Eurojust established a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) between Spain and Lithuania, while Europol contributed intelligence and operational assistance. Law enforcement executed searches in five different countries, confiscating digital assets and financial documents. The operation demonstrates the increasing complexity of crypto-related fraud, where criminals exploit legitimate financial systems to hide illegal proceeds. This case is part of a broader pattern in 2025, including the disruption of a $460 million crypto scam in Spain and a $540 million laundering network affecting 5,000 victims.
The effects of the fraud were widespread throughout Europe, with the majority of victims located in Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. According to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, investment scams rose by 25% in 2024, leading to $5.7 billion in losses, highlighting the global reach of crypto fraud. The European incident further demonstrates the difficulties in tackling digital asset crimes, as offenders take advantage of cryptocurrency anonymity and inconsistent regulations. Lithuania’s role as a laundering center was due in part to its financial system’s limited ability to monitor international crypto transactions.
Experts point out that this case reveals fundamental flaws in the cryptocurrency market. Inadequate trust systems, scarce insurance coverage, and slow regulatory responses make it easier for scams to thrive. While the dismantling of this network shows that international collaboration can disrupt criminal operations, it also emphasizes the urgent need for stronger regulatory measures. As Eurojust observed, the patchwork of national laws continues to benefit scammers, allowing them to operate across borders with little oversight.
Despite the operation’s achievements, concerns about future crypto-related crime persist. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission reported a record $12.5 billion in fraud losses in 2024, with $5.7 billion attributed to investment scams. Europol’s SOCTA 2025 report also identified cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi) as major drivers of modern financial crime, with criminals quickly adapting to new technologies. Although the European crackdown is a significant step, it serves as a reminder that the crypto industry remains risky for investors, demanding vigilant regulation and robust institutional safeguards to prevent further fraud.
---
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
As Morgan Stanley Moves Into Cryptocurrency, Rivals Rush to Catch Up
- Morgan Stanley launches crypto asset-allocation strategy, allowing clients to invest in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana via ETrade, with allocations based on risk profiles. - The initiative partners with Zerohash for custody and liquidity, aiming to normalize crypto as a legitimate asset class while addressing institutional demand for diversified exposure. - Competitors like Charles Schwab face pressure to accelerate crypto offerings, while regulatory clarity and cybersecurity remain critical challenges fo

SWIFT Faces a Blockchain Crossroads: Traditional Infrastructure or Decentralized Transactions?
- SWIFT tests XRP and HBAR for blockchain cross-border payments under ISO 20022, but denies formal Ripple partnership. - SWIFT's CIO rejects XRP as SWIFT replacement, citing governance gaps in public blockchains and 2025 ISO 20022 migration deadline. - XRP/HBAR prices fall amid regulatory uncertainty (SEC lawsuit ongoing) and SWIFT-Chainlink interoperability collaboration. - Analysts warn ISO 20022 prioritization could weaken XRP demand, though Ripple's institutional partnerships show real-time remittance

CTK’s ReFi Protocol Opens the Door to Tokenized Real Estate Financing at Scale

Why ConstructKoin (CTK) Could Be the Most Important ReFi Project of 2025

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








