Deadline Ends for Lenders to Secure Crypto Collateral Control

The implementation of UCC Article 12 in the United States has significantly altered the legal framework for secured transactions involving digital assets, particularly affecting lenders and borrowers who utilize cryptocurrency and other controllable electronic records (CERs) as collateral. The amendments to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), introduced by the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) in 2022, aim to modernize the treatment of digital assets in secured transactions. These changes have redefined the mechanisms by which security interests in digital assets are perfected and prioritized, with implications for both secured parties and obligors [1].

Under UCC Article 12, the concept of “control” has become central to the perfection and priority of security interests in CERs. Previously, lenders could often rely on UCC-1 financing statements to establish and maintain priority in collateral. However, with the adoption of UCC Article 12, perfection by “control”—defined as the practical ability to exert authority over the asset, such as through possession of a private key—is now a critical requirement for establishing first-priority status. This shift means that lenders who previously perfected their security interests through filing may now find their positions compromised if they have not updated their strategies to include control-based perfection [1].

The transition period for these amendments has been a critical window for lenders and borrowers to realign their practices with the new legal standards. The transition period typically lasts at least one year from the effective date of the amendments in a given state, but not before July 1, 2025. In Delaware, for example, the transition period ended on July 1, 2025, marking the point at which the legacy rules for digital asset perfection ceased to apply. Failure to adapt to these new rules during this transition period could result in a loss of priority to other secured creditors who have perfected their interests through control mechanisms under the new regime [1].

The practical implications of this transition are evident in the risk of leapfrogging, where a later-acting creditor that achieves control under UCC Article 12 may surpass the position of an earlier creditor who relied on the prior filing-only approach. This scenario can have significant financial consequences, particularly in cases where the value of digital assets is insufficient to satisfy multiple secured obligations. Lenders who fail to act in a timely manner may face substantial losses, underscoring the importance of proactive compliance with the new legal landscape [1].

Given the complexity and evolving nature of the UCC Article 12 regime, secured parties are advised to conduct a comprehensive review of their digital asset collateral strategies. This includes identifying the jurisdiction of the debtor, the method of collateral control, the governing law of relevant agreements, and the nature of the security interest itself. In states where the UCC Article 12 amendments have been adopted, lenders should assess whether they have a viable path to perfection under the new rules and, where necessary, amend their documentation and refile or amend UCC-1 statements. Coordination with legal advisors and ongoing monitoring of legal and technological developments are also essential to maintaining compliance and mitigating risk [1].

The adoption of UCC Article 12 is not uniform across the U.S., with variations in implementation and transition periods across states. As of the article’s publication, 32 states had adopted the 2022 UCC Amendments, with several others in the process of introduction or review. The differing approaches highlight the need for a multi-jurisdictional compliance strategy, particularly for lenders with borrowers operating in multiple states. The absence of adoption in certain key commercial jurisdictions, such as New York, further complicates the landscape, necessitating tailored strategies for each relevant legal environment [1].

In conclusion, the implementation of UCC Article 12 marks a pivotal shift in the treatment of digital assets in secured transactions. Lenders and borrowers must remain vigilant and adaptable to ensure that their interests are protected under the new legal framework. The transition period has provided a crucial opportunity to realign practices and documentation, and with the end of this period in key jurisdictions, the urgency for action has become paramount. The evolving legal and technological landscape underscores the importance of continuous monitoring and strategic compliance to navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by digital asset collateral in lending.

Source: