The Trade-off Between Bitcoin Aggregation and Shareholder Value at Strategy: A Delicate Balance of Risk and Reward
- Strategy Inc. (formerly MicroStrategy) has spent $25B+ buying 632,457 BTC (3% of supply) via equity issuance, eroding Bitcoin per Share and NAV by 40% since 2023. - The strategy relies on perpetual stock issuance below intrinsic value, risking forced BTC sales if prices drop 40% to $70,000 by 2026. - Bitcoin ETFs like IBIT/GBTC ($21.2B in assets) now offer regulated alternatives, reducing demand for Strategy's dilutive model. - Investors face a binary choice: tolerate dilution for potential BTC growth or
The pursuit of Bitcoin dominance by Strategy Inc. (formerly MicroStrategy) has redefined corporate treasury strategies, but at a steep cost to shareholder value. By issuing over $25 billion in equity since 2023 to accumulate 632,457 BTC—nearly 3% of the total supply—the company has created a paradox: a portfolio of unprecedented crypto exposure now shadowed by structural dilution risks [1]. This strategy, while generating $25.8 billion in unrealized gains in Q2 2025, has eroded Bitcoin per Share (BPS) and NAV per share by 40% since 2023, sparking investor skepticism [2].
The core tension lies in Strategy’s reliance on perpetual equity issuance to fund Bitcoin purchases. By abandoning its earlier 2.5x mNAV (market-to-NAV) restriction, the company now issues shares even when its stock trades at a discount to Bitcoin’s intrinsic value. For example, a $360 million capital raise in a single week in August 2025 occurred at a 1.4x mNAV, far below the 4x threshold considered “active” issuance [3]. This approach assumes Bitcoin will reach $150,000 by 2026, but a 40% price drop to $70,000 would trigger forced sales to cover $9.6 billion in annual preferred dividends, accelerating NAV erosion [4].
The risks are compounded by the rise of Bitcoin ETFs like iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), which captured $21.2 billion in institutional assets by Q1 2025. These vehicles offer regulated, liquid exposure to Bitcoin without corporate governance risks or dilution, reducing demand for Strategy’s model [5]. Meanwhile, regulatory clarity—such as the SEC’s guidance on staking and crypto accounting—has elevated Bitcoin’s legitimacy but also intensified scrutiny of corporate treasury strategies [6].
Critics argue that Strategy’s model resembles a “diluted Bitcoin trust,” where the cost of capital becomes a drag on long-term returns. A 2025 analysis found that while the company historically outperformed Bitcoin over multi-year horizons, its short-term volatility (beta of 1.31–1.41 relative to BTC) and leverage risks make it unsuitable for risk-averse investors [7]. The recent plunge in MSTR’s stock price to its lowest level since April 2025, following tepid demand for its STRC preferred stock offering, underscores this fragility [8].
For investors, the decision to support Strategy hinges on a binary bet: Does the potential for Bitcoin’s exponential growth outweigh the certainty of dilution? If Bitcoin’s price trajectory aligns with the company’s $150,000 2026 target, the dilution becomes a temporary cost. However, in a downturn, the leverage model could backfire, as forced sales and debt servicing needs create a “spiral of doom” [9].
The broader lesson is that corporate Bitcoin aggregation, while innovative, requires careful calibration. Strategy’s experience highlights the need for transparency in capital allocation, disciplined issuance thresholds, and contingency planning for price volatility. As the crypto landscape matures, investors must weigh the allure of crypto dominance against the fundamentals of corporate governance and shareholder stewardship.
Source:
[1] MicroStrategy's Bitcoin Treasury Strategy: Is Dilution a Price Worth Paying for the Long-Term?
[2] Strategy Adds $357 Million in Bitcoin After Resuming Common Stock Offerings to Fund BTC Buys
[3] Strategy Updates Its MSTR 2.5x mNAV Guidance After Two Weeks
[4] The Fragility of Bitcoin Treasury Companies in a Maturing Market
[5] Rise of Bitcoin Treasury Companies: Impact & Risks
[6] US Crypto Policy Tracker: Regulatory Developments
[7] Strategy Lags Bitcoin — What's Next for MSTR Investors?
[8] Strategy's MSTR Hits Lowest Since April as Company Eyes Further Dilution
[9] Analysts Warn of Share Dilution Risks as Strategy Prints More Stock to Buy Bitcoin
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Decoding VitaDAO: A Paradigm Revolution in Decentralized Science

Mars Morning News | ETH returns to $3,000, extreme fear sentiment has passed
The Federal Reserve's Beige Book shows little change in U.S. economic activity, with increasing divergence in the consumer market. JPMorgan predicts a Fed rate cut in December. Nasdaq has applied to increase the position limit for BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF options. ETH has returned to $3,000, signaling a recovery in market sentiment. Hyperliquid has sparked controversy due to a token symbol change. Binance faces a $1 billion terrorism-related lawsuit. Securitize has received EU approval to operate a tokenization trading system. The Tether CEO responded to S&P's credit rating downgrade. Large Bitcoin holders are increasing deposits to exchanges. Summary generated by Mars AI. The accuracy and completeness of this summary are still being iteratively improved by the Mars AI model.

The central bank sets a major tone on stablecoins for the first time—where will the market go next?
The People's Bank of China held a meeting to crack down on virtual currency trading and speculation, clearly defining stablecoins as a form of virtual currency with risks of illegal financial activities, and emphasized the continued prohibition of all virtual currency-related businesses.
