Hong Kong's Stablecoin Push Drives CNPC's Digital Payments Gamble
- CNPC explores stablecoin use for cross-border payments to cut costs and boost yuan adoption, tracking Hong Kong's regulatory shifts. - Hong Kong's 2025 Stablecoins Ordinance mandates licensing, reserves, and cybersecurity for Specified Stablecoins under HKMA oversight. - Stricter SFC rules prompted BitMart to withdraw VASP license application, raising compliance costs for crypto firms in Hong Kong. - Chinese tech firms apply for stablecoin licenses in Hong Kong, signaling confidence in digital assets for
China Petroleum Explores Stablecoin for Cross-Border Payments
China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), one of the world's largest oil producers, is examining the feasibility of using stablecoins to facilitate cross-border payments and settlements. During its half-year results briefing, CNPC management indicated to analysts that the company is monitoring the regulatory developments around stablecoin issuance, particularly those under review by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) [1]. The exploration is part of a broader initiative to assess whether stablecoins can reduce transaction costs and enhance the international adoption of the yuan.
The decision by CNPC to investigate stablecoin applications is aligned with broader regulatory shifts in the region. The HKMA’s Stablecoins Ordinance (Cap. 656) took effect on 1 August 2025, introducing a statutory regime that governs the primary issuance of fiat-referenced stablecoins and secondary-market activities involving tokens with a Hong Kong nexus [2]. The ordinance defines “Specified Stablecoins” as cryptographically secured digital tokens designed to maintain a stable value, typically referencing an official currency or units of account designated by the HKMA. This regulatory framework is intended to ensure financial integrity and mitigate risks such as money laundering and terrorism financing.
Under the HKMA’s new regime, stablecoin issuers must obtain a license unless exempted, and compliance with a range of statutory conditions is mandatory. These include maintaining reserve assets, adhering to robust risk management protocols, and ensuring cybersecurity. The licensing process is currently being administered by invitation and in phases, with the HKMA requiring applicants to engage directly with its licensing team before submitting applications [2]. The HKMA also emphasized that all issued Specified Stablecoins must be fully backed at all times, including those that are frozen or blacklisted, and that any tokenized representations of eligible assets must meet high standards of quality, liquidity, and minimal risk.
The regulatory environment has influenced market dynamics, with some firms opting to withdraw their applications for virtual asset service provider licenses in Hong Kong. BitMart, for example, recently withdrew its application for a virtual asset service provider license, joining other major exchanges in doing so [4]. This trend reflects the stringent licensing requirements imposed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), including high minimum capital thresholds and strict custody regulations for client assets. These requirements have led to increased compliance costs and operational complexity for firms seeking to operate in the region.
Despite the challenges, the regulatory clarity provided by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority has attracted interest from local firms seeking to integrate stablecoin technologies into their business models. Some Chinese technology companies have already applied for licenses under the new framework, signaling growing confidence in the potential for stablecoins to support financial innovation and cross-border transactions [3]. The development of a robust stablecoin ecosystem in Hong Kong is seen as a strategic move to position the region as a global crypto hub, leveraging its existing strengths in financial services.
As CNPC moves forward with its feasibility study, the company is expected to evaluate the technical, regulatory, and economic implications of adopting stablecoin technology. This initiative underscores the growing role of digital assets in modernizing financial infrastructure and could set a precedent for other state-owned enterprises in China to explore similar opportunities in the digital economy.
Source:
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
JOE +58.75% in 24 Hours as On-Chain Activity and Exchange Listings Drive Momentum
- JOE surged 58.75% in 24 hours on Aug 29, 2025, driven by increased on-chain activity and new exchange listings. - Technical indicators show bullish momentum, with RSI in overbought territory and MACD remaining positive, reinforcing a 50-day/200-day moving average crossover. - Analysts highlight growing institutional wallet accumulation but caution about short-term volatility risks amid a 5789.62% annual decline.

The Case for Ethereum as a Core Institutional Asset
- Ethereum’s 10-year price surge of 1.2 million percent and institutional adoption redefine digital-age value creation. - Proof-of-stake transition and Pectra upgrade enhance security, driving $223B DeFi TVL and 3–6% staking yields. - Institutional Ethereum ETFs attract $7.1B in 2025, with Wall Street endorsing it as a secure, high-yield asset. - GENIUS Act and stablecoin infrastructure solidify Ethereum’s role in tokenizing real-world assets and institutional portfolios.

Litecoin (LTC) and Avalon X (AVLX): Contrasting Paths in a Shifting Crypto Market
- - In a maturing crypto market, investors diversify by balancing Litecoin's institutional stability ($110.23) with Avalon X's RWA innovation ($0.005). - - Litecoin shows 75% long-term holders and $2.8B daily volume, while Avalon X tokenizes luxury real estate with 7% annual burns and 15% staking rewards. - - LTC's ETF potential and corporate adoption contrast with AVLX's $16T RWA market exposure, offering defensive vs speculative investment profiles. - - Both projects highlight crypto's evolution toward b

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








