Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert & block trade
Convert crypto with one click and zero fees
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
Judge upholds 'bulk' of SEC case against Binance but nixes secondary sales charge, among others

Judge upholds 'bulk' of SEC case against Binance but nixes secondary sales charge, among others

The BlockThe Block2024/06/29 16:28
By:The Block

Quick Take A federal judge mostly rejected Binance’s attempt to throw out the SEC’s charges against the exchange and its founder in a widely-anticipated lawsuit separate from the Department of Justice case that has already landed Binance founder Changpeng Zhao in prison. Binance’s BUSD and Simple Earn programs got a thumbs-up from the court, however, which found that neither offering constituted an investment contract. The charge related to secondary sales of BNB was also notably dropped, in a ruling citin

Binance's attempt to whittle down the charges levied by the SEC has largely failed after a federal judge upheld most of the agency's complaints against the company for potentially offering unregistered investment products and violating anti-fraud provisions. 

The ruling found most of the agency's arguments plausible and rejected certain arguments made by Binance that have also been rejected by fellow judges, such as the idea that the Major Questions Doctrine means the SEC lacks the authority to regulate the crypto industry altogether. 

In addition, the court found that Binance founder and former CEO Changpeng Zhao, who is currently serving jail time related to charges against Binance from the Department of Justice in a separate case, may be personally liable for Binance's violations given his control over the company.

However, the judge also dismissed certain claims related to some of the charges. For instance, Binance's initial sales of BUSD were deemed appropriate by the court as "the description of the asset, how it was sold, and how the proceeds from its sale were to be distributed is quite different from the allegations concerning BNB +0.10% , and the allegations do not align with the prongs of the Howey test," the ruling by Judge Amy Berman Jackson states. Judge Jackson also dismissed claims related to secondary sales of BNB and Binance's Simple Earn program, though the charge against Binance's Earn Vault will move forward. Out of 13 charges, only one count (related to the BUSD sales) was dismissed in full . 

While the ruling appears damaging to Binance's prospects in the SEC case, legal experts across the crypto industry have celebrated Judge Jackson's dismissal of the secondary sales charge. "The ruling dismissing the SEC's claims involving secondary market sales by third parties is clearly a win for the greater crypto industry," crypto-focused attorney James "MetaLawMan" Murphy posted on X . 

Judge Jackson also rebuked the agency for seeming to argue both sides of one question: whether or not crypto assets, once sold as securities, must retain that designation forever. "At the hearing on the motion, the SEC seemed to speaking out of both sides of its mouth on this issue. At several points, it took pains to disavow any intention to argue that once the assets were sold as securities, they retained that character forever...while at others, it left the distinct impression that that was exactly what it meant," wrote Judge Jackson. 

Jackson's ruling gave the overall impression that rulings on crypto assets should be taken case-by-case, and a broad statement as to whether all crypto assets represent investment contracts is unlikely. "...The determination of whether any sale constitutes an investment contract must be based on the totality of the circumstances surrounding that sale, and what an objective buyer’s understandings would be," the filing states, reiterating the finding of the court in the Ripple case . 


0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like