Analysis: The price of Bitcoin will have to rise at least to $90,000 to $100,000 before it faces a new consolidation period or pullback
PANews reported on May 22, according to Cointelegraph, a cryptocurrency trader nicknamed "Roman" stated in an interview that the current cryptocurrency market is in a "real bull market", with both fundamentals and technical aspects showing positive trends. He analyzed that although the price of Bitcoin had previously fallen from its historical high of $73,738 to $58,000, this adjustment has laid a solid foundation for future price increases. Roman specifically mentioned the "bullish reversal pattern" that appeared on this week's Bitcoin price chart, considering it as a strong signal indicating that it is unlikely for Bitcoin to enter a consolidation period before surpassing its historical high of $73,679 on March 12 and increasing by at least 20%. He asserted that the price of Bitcoin will rise to at least $90,000 to $100,000 before facing a new consolidation period or pullback.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
After bitcoin returns to $90,000, is Christmas or a Christmas crash coming next?
This Thanksgiving, we are grateful for bitcoin returning to $90,000.

Bitcoin security reaches a historic high, but miner revenue drops to a historic low. Where will mining companies find new sources of income?
The current paradox of the Bitcoin network is particularly striking: while the protocol layer has never been more secure due to high hash power, the underlying mining industry is facing pressure from capital liquidation and consolidation.

What are the privacy messaging apps Session and SimpleX donated by Vitalik?
Why did Vitalik take action? From content encryption to metadata privacy.

The covert war escalates: Hyperliquid faces a "kamikaze" attack, but the real battle may have just begun
The attacker incurred a loss of 3 million in a "suicidal" attack, but may have achieved breakeven through external hedging. This appears more like a low-cost "stress test" targeting the protocol's defensive capabilities.
