High fees, Runes excitement lead to drop in Bitcoin active addresses
Quick Take High fees might have caused the slowdown in Bitcoin active addresses, but it doesn’t appear to be the main culprit. This is an excerpt from The Block’s Data & Insights newsletter.
It was mentioned a few weeks ago that for the first time since March 2020, the 7-day moving average of active addresses on the Bitcoin BTC -1.91% network fell below 700,000 as fees surged after the halving due to excitement about Runes.
This was not unexpected; high fees can price out users and prevent them from interacting with the blockchain.
When fees become unsustainably high, like they did with Runes, users who are unwilling to pay them sit back. Eventually, the hype dies down, and fees stabilize again, allowing the users to come back and transact at more leveled prices.
However, that does not seem to be the case more recently. While the 7-day moving average dropped to 689,810 on April 23, it rebounded slightly to 839,400 on April 30 as fees calmed down. The 7-day moving average of the average transaction fee on the network was $39.15 on April 23 compared to $11.92 on April 30.
The moving average of active addresses has fallen lower than before, at only 655,190 on May 12. In contrast, the moving average of transaction fees has also declined to $3.86, in line with where fees were pre-halving.
A similar trend has emerged for new addresses on the network, which typically follow a similar pattern to active addresses, given transactions generate change addresses. They then send any remaining funds not sent in a transaction to a different address that's still controlled by the sender, sort of like getting change back when you pay in cash. The moving average of new addresses dipped to 290,000, which is the lowest it has gotten since July 2018.
Runes-related transactions still make up a sizable portion of Bitcoin activity, typically accounting for more than half of daily transactions since they launched. The frenetic energy and the need to be the first to get in have died out, however, allowing for fees to calm down since there’s less of a desire to pay a heavy premium to get a transaction prioritized.
The high fees might have initially caused the slowdown in bitcoin active addresses, but it does not seem to be the main culprit anymore. Some people may continue waiting for further indications that the Runes excitement is truly over. The broader market slowdown could also be playing a role in the decline.
This is an excerpt from The Block's Data Insights newsletter . Dig into the numbers making up the industry’s most thought-provoking trends.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
COC the Game Changer: When Everything in GameFi Becomes "Verifiable", the Era of P2E 3.0 Begins
The article analyzes the development of the GameFi sector from Axie Infinity to Telegram games, pointing out that Play to Earn 1.0 failed due to the collapse of its economic model and trust issues, while Play for Airdrop was short-lived because it could not retain users. COC Game has introduced the VWA mechanism, which verifies key data on-chain in an attempt to address trust issues and build a sustainable economic model. Summary generated by Mars AI. This summary was generated by the Mars AI model, and its accuracy and completeness are still being iteratively updated.

BTC Volatility Weekly Review (November 17 - December 1)
Key metrics (from 4:00 PM HKT on November 17 to 4:00 PM HKT on December 1): BTC/USD: -9.6% (...

When all GameFi tokens have dropped out of the TOP 100, can COC reignite the narrative with a Bitcoin economic model?
On November 27, $COC mining will be launched. The opportunity to mine the first block won't wait for anyone.

Ethereum's Next Decade: From "Verifiable Computer" to "Internet Property Rights"
Fede, the founder of LambdaClass, provides an in-depth explanation of anti-fragility, the 1 Gigagas scaling goal, and the vision for Lean Ethereum.

