Precio de JupiterJUP

entry long JupUsdt, and target 0.66 usdt

Solana ETFs face SEC deadlines Oct 10–16, with major issuers (VanEck, Fidelity, Grayscale, Bitwise and more) updating filings last week. On-chain shows ~3M $SOL withdrawn from exchanges in 6 days, spot traders are accumulating, but options skew signals mid-term caution. $JUP $PEPE

Upcoming unlock schedule for 50 tokens; I personally only look to trade Futures when it’s a Cliff Unlock and the unlocked amount is greater than 25% of daily trading volume. If you’re focused on long-term investing, pay attention so you can optimize entries after each unlock. Currently, there are 11 unlock events worth watching where the unlocked amount versus daily trading volume is high: $JUP - 44,69% $BIGTIME - 128,31% $PRIME - 52,14% $REZ - 41,02% $KMNO - 79,84% $SUI - 12878,18% $ZETA - 66,52% $GPS - 37,39% $EIGEN - 39,60% $IMX - 26,26% $SPEC - 114,55% #TokenUnlocks #CryptoInsights

Distribution is the silent catalyst in crypto. A token lives in obscurity until it finds its stage. Case in point: ➢ $PENDLE: volumes and price re-rated sharply after Upbit access. ➢ $ASTR, $JUP: both saw narrative expansion post-listing. The common factor? @Official_Upbit. The same setup is now in play for @Infinit_Labs' $IN. Key context: 75% of supply is still locked, meaning float is thin. In such cases, new demand creates reflexivity: price moves drive attention → more liquidity → stronger flows → further price moves. ● The Reflexivity Loop Explained Thin float tokens respond disproportionately to distribution shocks. - Circulating supply: 230M $IN (out of 1B max). - Float %: 23%. Effect = higher marginal impact per dollar traded. Reflexivity loop: - Price up = attracts social/CT attention - Volume up = more traders onboard - Liquidity up = allocators engage - Narrative consolidates = reinforces demand This loop is already visible in $IN’s early Upbit trading data. ● Fundamentals vs. Distribution Listings alone don’t create sustainable value. They only accelerate existing fundamentals. $IN has fundamentals to back it: ➢ Infinit V2: one-click DeFi strategy execution. ➢ AI agent swarm: specialized bots for discovery, execution, risk. ➢ Non-custodial design: assets remain in user wallets. Distribution (Upbit) + Infrastructure (V2) = a stronger feedback system. ● My $IN Price Prediction If @Infinit_Labs scales as the “agentic execution layer” for DeFi, token value should track platform volumes. Assumptions: - TAM (2026): $50B DeFi automation notional (restaking, intent markets, structured yield). - Market share: 3% = $1.5B annualized volume. - Take rate: 20 bps = $3M fees. - Multiple: 15x (Pendle benchmark). → $45M value accrual. At 230M circulating tokens → $0.20 fair value (3x vs current). Upside case (10% share by 2027): - $5B volume → $10M fees → $200M value capture. - $0.85/token (10–12x). ● Conclusion Thin float + new demand creates reflexivity. But reflexivity without fundamentals burns out. $IN’s edge is that Infinit V2 and the agent swarm give the loop something to anchor to.