Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Pressure UC Through Funding
- A federal judge blocked Trump's plan to defund UC over antisemitism claims, citing First and Tenth Amendment violations. - The $1.2B funding demand and civil rights investigations were deemed coercive tactics to suppress "woke" academic views. - UC warned the financial threat would devastate its research programs, while critics called the strategy authoritarian. - The ruling preserves UC's funding but leaves unresolved tensions over government influence in higher education.
A federal judge has halted the Trump administration’s efforts to withdraw funding from the University of California (UC) system, determining that the attempt to punish the university over claims of antisemitism and discrimination breaches constitutional rights. On November 15, 2025, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction, stopping the administration from levying penalties or suspending federal grants without proper legal procedures. She described the move as part of a larger initiative to eliminate “woke,” “left-leaning,” and “socialist” perspectives from the nation’s top universities
The administration’s campaign began in the summer of 2025, when it demanded that UC pay $1.2 billion to regain access to frozen research funds,
The decision highlights ongoing friction between the Trump administration and higher education, a frequent target of conservative scrutiny. The administration has criticized diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as unfair, claiming they disadvantage white and Asian American students. In October 2025, officials offered a contentious agreement to nine universities,
UC President James B. Milliken cautioned that the $1.2 billion demand would severely harm the system,
The case has sparked strong opposition from advocacy organizations and Democratic leaders. California Governor Gavin Newsom warned that universities accepting the administration’s terms would lose state support, while Democracy Forward, a progressive legal advocacy group,
With the injunction in effect, the UC system has avoided an immediate financial crisis but still faces ongoing risks. The administration’s campaign against universities, presented as a defense of free speech, has instead ignited debates about academic independence and the government’s influence over education. As the legal battle continues, the outcome may set a precedent for resolving federal funding disputes—and determine whether universities can withstand politically driven financial pressure.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
DASH surges 30.39% over the past week amid strategic growth moves and positive analyst revisions
- DoorDash's DASH stock fell 10.59% in 24 hours but surged 30.39% in 7 days, driven by a strategic Old Navy partnership expanding retail delivery services. - Acquisitions of Deliveroo and autonomous delivery partnerships with Coco Robotics, plus $10.72B revenue and 49.2% gross margin, strengthened market leadership. - Analysts raised price targets to $260 with "Outperform" ratings, citing growth potential despite a high 98.1 P/E ratio reflecting market optimism. - Technical analysis shows bullish reversal
Aster News Today: Optimism Faces Prudence: ASTER Approaches $1.21 Following RSI CEO's 16% Stake Sale
- Aster (ASTER) rose 8% toward $1.21 as Binance-backed DEX hit $3T in cumulative trading volume. - RSI CEO sold 16% stake ($11M+), raising doubts despite Q2 revenue growth (19.7%) and EPS beat. - ASTER faces mixed signals: bullish triangle pattern vs. declining fees, 50% open interest drop, and stagnant adoption. - Analysts remain divided: RSI's 22% YTD gain contrasts with ASTER's uncertain breakout potential amid waning trader enthusiasm.

The ChainOpera AI Token Crash: An Urgent Warning for Cryptocurrency Projects Powered by AI
- ChainOpera AI's COAI token collapsed 96% in late 2025, exposing systemic risks in AI-driven DeFi ecosystems. - Centralized governance (10 wallets controlled 87.9% supply) and misaligned incentives exacerbated panic selling during crises. - Technical flaws included untested AI models with 270% increased vulnerabilities and inadequate smart contract security audits. - Regulatory shifts like the GENIUS Act compounded liquidity challenges, highlighting the need for compliance-ready AI crypto projects. - Inve

How large a portion of the AI data center surge will rely on renewable energy sources?